<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>EPO admits that EPLA is a way to legalise software patents</title>
		<link>http://digital-majority.wikidot.com/forum/t-8330/epo-admits-that-epla-is-a-way-to-legalise-software-patents</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;EPO admits that EPLA is a way to legalise software patents&quot; - David Sant, former EPO lobbyist in Brussels, is admitting that the EPLA is a new way to get software patents legalised in Europe.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 14:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://digital-majority.wikidot.com/forum/t-8330#post-19638</guid>
				<title>Re: EPO admits that EPLA is a way to legalise software paten</title>
				<link>http://digital-majority.wikidot.com/forum/t-8330/epo-admits-that-epla-is-a-way-to-legalise-software-patents#post-19638</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>While Mr Sant does not work for the EPO anymore, he is now a patent attorney promoting software patents:</p> <blockquote> <p>David Sant returned to London in 2005 and now works in a London firm of patent attorneys, where his main interests are patents in telecommunications and software, as well as patent portfolio management and commercialisation services.</p> </blockquote> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://digital-majority.wikidot.com/forum/t-8330#post-19633</guid>
				<title>EPO admits that EPLA is a way to legalise software patents</title>
				<link>http://digital-majority.wikidot.com/forum/t-8330/epo-admits-that-epla-is-a-way-to-legalise-software-patents#post-19633</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>In an <a href="http://www.iscintelligence.com/index.php?theme=38">interview published by Intelligence in Science</a>, David Sant, former EPO lobbyist in Brussels, is mentioned to have said the following:</p> <blockquote> <p>He explains that there is a pressing need in Europe to harmonise national patent rulings and to ensure legal certainty. <strong>The acrimonious debate over the proposed directive on computer-implemented inventions might never have arisen if the patent litigation system in Europe had been unified, thereby eliminating the possibility of disparate national rulings on the same patent matter.</strong> In addition, industry seeks an affordable and efficient litigation system, which the EPLA would provide, thus allowing European industry to innovate in a legal environment similar to those enjoyed in the USA and Japan.</p> </blockquote> <p>Now event the EPO agrees that EPLA is the next attempt to get software patents validated in Europe.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>