<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>IP summit 06: Reding wants Interoperability</title>
		<link>https://digital-majority.wikidot.com/forum/t-2067/ip-summit-06:reding-wants-interoperability</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;IP summit 06: Reding wants Interoperability&quot; - Commissioner Reding presents her plans for Interoperability.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 09:03:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://digital-majority.wikidot.com/forum/t-2067#post-4239</guid>
				<title>IP summit 06: Reding wants Interoperability</title>
				<link>https://digital-majority.wikidot.com/forum/t-2067/ip-summit-06:reding-wants-interoperability#post-4239</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 04:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Anonymous</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Heise report (<a href="http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/82198">German</a>): Reding is all for Interoperability but wants the market to find solutions. It is strange that she wants to abstain regulation where indeed the government has a regulatory mandate. From an ordoliberal perspective market order is one of the fields where governments should intervene. So we get the worst of both worlds: Intervention where no market order is at stake, but where governments may play a useful role for safeguarding functioning competition, market order is left to the market.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>